My quest to write a God-awful first draft is going swimmingly

junjouprince:

pedal

posted 8 hours agoOctober 21, 2014 with 1,538 notes - via / origreblog

iraffiruse:

Combined Gifs

posted 8 hours agoOctober 21, 2014 with 33,486 notes - via / origreblog
posted 8 hours agoOctober 21, 2014 with 40 notes - via / origreblog
ringo23:



▵っゅ▵ 



@tsuuuyu


咥えゴムもえ
posted 9 hours agoOctober 21, 2014 with 2,859 notes - via / origreblog

Every time I finish a paragraph of this paper I get to eat a Twizzler

Every time I slack off and go on Tumblr I have to shove one up my ass

posted 9 hours agoOctober 21, 2014 with 3 notes • reblog

izayaboorihara:

oh you’re watching durarara? I love that anime. The way they just [clenches fist] du all those fucking ras

posted 9 hours agoOctober 21, 2014 with 981 notes - via / origreblog

zic0sdreads:

xxxxxxxxbearded-glory:

christmascrayonwillow:

candycreme:

do you ever just start thinking about sex and zone out for a couple of seconds and stare into space and then you come back and you’re like ah shit i hope no one realised i was thinking about sex just now

#disappointed glare at my boner for giving everything away

(Source: cremebun)

posted 9 hours agoOctober 21, 2014 with 503,401 notes - via / origreblog
urulokid:

millika:

Who’s Alex?
Billboard demonstrating gender stereotypes as most people automatically assume that Alex is the boy.

Actually, I’ve studied design and advertising, and I can tell you that the reason people would look at this and immediately assume Alex is the boy is because, quite simply, the boy is the focal point of the ad.
English-speaking readers’ line of sight goes from left to right and up to down. This ad leads the viewer from the words MEET ALEX etc straight to the boy and then over and down to the girl. I didn’t even notice there was a set of parenthesis with words in them in the ad until I looked the fourth time. 
This is a fallacious confirmation bias, as anyone looking at it will assume Alex is the focal point (i.e. The Boy) and then if they’re perceptive they’ll notice the words at the bottom. Aha! Those damn gender stereotypes gotcha again! Except no, because the ad literally forces you to read it as “Alex is the boy” by the visual language and lines of sight. 
A better ad would have been structured from top to bottom instead of left to right, and wouldn’t have pushed the girl, the real subject of the ad (who, by the way, has been VISUALLY PUSHED OUT OF HER RIGHTFUL SPACE ON THE AD BY HER BROTHER) off to the corner as far away from her identifiers as possible. 
Here, I’ll make you a better ad.

Bam. Shitty stock photo but you get the point. If anyone sees this and assumes Alex is the boy, they don’t have the the ad layout to use as an excuse for their internalized gender shittery. Likewise, the ad isn’t actively trying to make you read it a certain way and THEN making you feel guilty for interpreting it the way they designed it to be. 

urulokid:

millika:

Who’s Alex?

Billboard demonstrating gender stereotypes as most people automatically assume that Alex is the boy.

Actually, I’ve studied design and advertising, and I can tell you that the reason people would look at this and immediately assume Alex is the boy is because, quite simply, the boy is the focal point of the ad.

English-speaking readers’ line of sight goes from left to right and up to down. This ad leads the viewer from the words MEET ALEX etc straight to the boy and then over and down to the girl. I didn’t even notice there was a set of parenthesis with words in them in the ad until I looked the fourth time. 

This is a fallacious confirmation bias, as anyone looking at it will assume Alex is the focal point (i.e. The Boy) and then if they’re perceptive they’ll notice the words at the bottom. Aha! Those damn gender stereotypes gotcha again! Except no, because the ad literally forces you to read it as “Alex is the boy” by the visual language and lines of sight. 

A better ad would have been structured from top to bottom instead of left to right, and wouldn’t have pushed the girl, the real subject of the ad (who, by the way, has been VISUALLY PUSHED OUT OF HER RIGHTFUL SPACE ON THE AD BY HER BROTHER) off to the corner as far away from her identifiers as possible. 

Here, I’ll make you a better ad.

image

Bam. Shitty stock photo but you get the point. If anyone sees this and assumes Alex is the boy, they don’t have the the ad layout to use as an excuse for their internalized gender shittery. Likewise, the ad isn’t actively trying to make you read it a certain way and THEN making you feel guilty for interpreting it the way they designed it to be. 

posted 9 hours agoOctober 21, 2014 with 363,384 notes - via / origreblog

(Source: lonelychav)

posted 9 hours agoOctober 21, 2014 with 66,257 notes - via / origreblog

fullunadulteratedart:

when a fanfic casually drops a reference or line from the show

image

posted 9 hours agoOctober 21, 2014 with 12,305 notes - via / origreblog

I’ll make my first draft so God-awful the final looks like Shakespeare in comparison

they won’t suspect a thing

posted 11 hours agoOctober 21, 2014 with 2 notes • reblog

One of my professors made a comment today… like “organizing my desk, not being OCD or anything, lol, blah blah blah” and I was a bit disappointed because we recently had a long conversation about my struggles with OCD and not being taken seriously but I guess it didn’t stick

posted 12 hours agoOctober 21, 2014 with 1 note • reblog
posted 12 hours agoOctober 21, 2014 with 8,962 notes - via / origreblog

myheartbeatsforhummus:

This post is eveeeeeeeerything

(Source: murdalinmurda)

posted 12 hours agoOctober 21, 2014 with 260,056 notes - via / origreblog